TV can’t be harmful for children because it occupies their attention for hours and keeps them off the streets.” Is this argument against the idea that TV can be harmful for children convincing? It is an example of the fallacy called irrelevant reason. This fallacy occurs when the argument given to support a proposition has little or no relevance to the proposition. Here is another example: “Conservationists have suggested that we could conserve fuel by increasing the tax on gasoline. But more taxes, whether they’re paid by the oil companies or passed on to the consumer at the pump, will not produce one more barrel of oil.” What are your perspectives?

Best Available Writers

TV can’t be harmful for children because it occupies their attention for hours and keeps them off the streets.” Is this argument against the idea that TV can be harmful for children convincing? It is an example of the fallacy called irrelevant reason. This fallacy occurs when the argument given to support a proposition has little or no relevance to the proposition.

Here is another example: “Conservationists have suggested that we could conserve fuel by increasing the tax on gasoline. But more taxes, whether they’re paid by the oil companies or passed on to the consumer at the pump, will not produce one more barrel of oil.” What are your perspectives?

TV can’t be harmful for children because it occupies their attention for hours and keeps them off the streets.” Is this argument against the idea that TV can be harmful for children convincing? It is an example of the fallacy called irrelevant reason. This fallacy occurs when the argument given to support a proposition has little or no relevance to the proposition.

Save your time - order a paper!

Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Order Paper Now

Here is another example: “Conservationists have suggested that we could conserve fuel by increasing the tax on gasoline. But more taxes, whether they’re paid by the oil companies or passed on to the consumer at the pump, will not produce one more barrel of oil.” What are your perspectives?

TV can’t be harmful for children because it occupies their attention for hours and keeps them off the streets.” Is this argument against the idea that TV can be harmful for children convincing? It is an example of the fallacy called irrelevant reason. This fallacy occurs when the argument given to support a proposition has little or no relevance to the proposition.

Here is another example: “Conservationists have suggested that we could conserve fuel by increasing the tax on gasoline. But more taxes, whether they’re paid by the oil companies or passed on to the consumer at the pump, will not produce one more barrel of oil.” What are your perspectives?

TV can’t be harmful for children because it occupies their attention for hours and keeps them off the streets.” Is this argument against the idea that TV can be harmful for children convincing? It is an example of the fallacy called irrelevant reason. This fallacy occurs when the argument given to support a proposition has little or no relevance to the proposition.

Here is another example: “Conservationists have suggested that we could conserve fuel by increasing the tax on gasoline. But more taxes, whether they’re paid by the oil companies or passed on to the consumer at the pump, will not produce one more barrel of oil.” What are your perspectives?

TV can’t be harmful for children because it occupies their attention for hours and keeps them off the streets.” Is this argument against the idea that TV can be harmful for children convincing? It is an example of the fallacy called irrelevant reason. This fallacy occurs when the argument given to support a proposition has little or no relevance to the proposition.

Here is another example: “Conservationists have suggested that we could conserve fuel by increasing the tax on gasoline. But more taxes, whether they’re paid by the oil companies or passed on to the consumer at the pump, will not produce one more barrel of oil.” What are your perspectives?

Best Available Writers