The purpose of this paper is to discuss the two-sided debate of drilling in the Arctic wildlife refuge.

Running title: final project 2

You can pick any assignment from week 1-4 or any two sided environmental issue

To drill or not to drill in ANWR (PUT YOUR TITLE HERE)

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

James potter (YOUR NAME)

Rasmussen University

Author’s Note:

The purpose of this paper is to discuss the two-sided debate of drilling in the Arctic wildlife refuge. (YOUR TITLE) Written for Instructor Lissa Kane, on the date February 18th 2021 (your date) course G328, Human Uses of the Environment.

Title of your research (i.e Global warming: Fact or fiction)

The Controversy (please keep this heading for rough draft and final)

: Identify the controversy

Go into detail on what the two sides are and what you plan to research

(minimum one page you can remove this part once you have your one page minimum)

Yellow HIGH light part can be removed once you have your research and information

The Major Players (please keep this heading for rough draft and final)

(minimum one page)

· Who is involved? Why are they involved?

· Go into detail on all the players involved in both sides of this debate

Yellow HIGH light part can be removed once you have your research and information

Important Facts: (please keep this heading for rough draft and final)

· (minimum one page)

· State relevant facts concerning the issue. Try to separate fact from opinion. Try not to show your own bias. Properly use APA citations

Yellow HIGH light part can be removed once you have your research and information

Side One: (please keep this heading for rough draft and final)

· (minimum one page)

· Arguments; state briefly and cite your sources

Yellow HIGH light part can be removed once you have your research and information

Side Two: ((please keep this heading for rough draft and final))

· Arguments; state briefly and cite your sources

HIGH lighted part can be removed once you have your research and information

Your Opinion and Rationale (please keep this heading for rough draft and final))

(minimum one page)

· I believe that…, We should…, I feel that… Use supporting arguments and

· rationale. What arguments would you use to present to those who disagree with you? Cite all of your sources.

· This is where you can tell me which side you agree with and why

HIGH lighted part can be removed once you have your research and information

References:

· Alphabetize your sources. Make sure there are sources representing both sides of the issue.

Your references must match your intext citations

Examples of how I want your references done

Lamb, G. (2005, September 27). Science and politics: a dangerous mix. Christian Science Monitor97(213), 11-13. Retrieved April 10, 2016, from Academic Search Premier database.

Link to article

Pielke Jr., R. (2006, Spring2006). When Scientists Politicize Science. Regulation29(1), 28-34. Retrieved April 10, 2016, from Business Source Complete database.

Link to article

Author last name is always first (this is how they are put in order)

Date of publication

Name of article and publication

DATE IT WAS RETRIEVED BY YOU

From where it was retrieved and the link

Back to School Offer

Get 15% of Your First Order amount back in Reward Credits!