We brings you the best in custom paper writing!
To get started, simply place an order and provide the details!Order Now
Author a 1,300 to 2,200-word examination of your present values, beliefs, commitments and/or actions in the light of course readings in topic areas such as the Humanities, Education, the Meaning of Life, Love, Happiness, and The Arts, Popular Culture, and Our Humanity. Students must author a concentrated analysis answering one or more specific questions. Given that the topics of the course are inherently interconnected students may draw on readings from more than one area.
ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS
The emphasis of this paper, however, should be on providing in-depth consideration of a particular question or topic. Put differently: do not sacrifice depth of analysis in order to cover a lot of ground. Students are encouraged to identify a particular focus and answer a question that is particularly of interest and importance to them.
Content and form:
The paper need not be a cut-and-dry argument driven paper, but it must have discernable purpose and direction. This essay must also directly consider and engage course works and ideas relevant to the chosen topic. Furthermore, students should consider and engage ideas that challenge as well as confirm the author’s own thinking. Finally, be sure to thoughtfully organize and develop the paper: interesting introduction, carefully developed body paragraphs, conclusion. Identify and articulate the key question your paper is considering and seeking to answer or bring clarity to. Draw on, implement and/or critically evaluate course ideas/works relevant to your paper’s focus. For example: How does Epicurus’ vision of the good life challenge your present lifestyle? What does Seneca get right/wrong in conceptualizing the happy life? What insights or challenges does a film like Seeking a Friend for the End of the World provoke in you? How does Virginia Woolf’s approach to life validate/support or challenge your way of living? Consider contrasting or opposing perspectives (i.e. those ideas you do not (or are less) convinced by) Imagine that you were arguing that your philosophy of life is justified. Further, imagine that you bring Epicurus into your paper to offer support: you explain how your philosophy of life relates to some of his ideas and why you believe he’s right. For this particular paper, for example, considering contrasting or opposing views might involve bringing Seneca or Aristotle’s ideas up as a counter to the view you and Epicurus support, and explaining why those views are not (or less) convincing.