Create an educational presentation for staff before the launch of your change project. This should inform the staff of the problem, your potential solution, and their role in change project.

Get Help from Experts

If you’re still asking yourself, “Who can help me write my paper from scratch", don’t hesitate to use us. Experienced writers will immediately write, proofread, or improve your academic paper. They can also help you choose a topic and edit your references into APA or MLA format. So, what are you waiting for?

Find your writer

Preventing 30-day Hospital Readmission

1. Create an educational presentation for staff before the launch of your change project. This should inform the staff of the problem, your potential solution, and their role in change project.

2. The format for this proposal will be a PowerPoint presentation.

Get Help from Experts

If you’re still asking yourself, “Who can help me write my paper from scratch", don’t hesitate to use us. Experienced writers will immediately write, proofread, or improve your academic paper. They can also help you choose a topic and edit your references into APA or MLA format. So, what are you waiting for?

Find your writer

3. The length of the PowerPoint presentation should be 15-20 slides; excluding the title and reference slides.

4. Below are the main topics or bullet points for your slides:

1. Title slide

2. Description of the Ace Star change model that you have used for this project.

3. Practice Issue (Using the one of the required articles)

4. Scope of the problem—use basic statistics from what you know of the problem in your work area.

5. Your team/stakeholders

6. Evidence to support your need for change—from your Evidence Summary

7. Action Plan

8. Timeline for the plan

9. The nurse’s role and responsibility in the pilot program

10. Procedure (what steps are to be taken to complete this change process, from start to finish?)

11. Forms that will be used (if applicable)

12. Resources available to the staff—including yourself

13. Summary

14. References

1. Citations and References must be included to support the information within each topic area. Refer to the APA manual, Chapter 7, for examples of proper reference format. Citations are to be noted for all information contained in your paper that is not your original idea or thought. Ask yourself, “How do I know this?” and then cite the source. Scholarly sources are expected, which means choose peer-reviewed journals and credible websites.

Guidelines

· Length: The PowerPoint slide show is expected to be between 15-20 slides in length (not including the title slide and reference list slides).

Best Practices in Preparing a PowerPoint Presentation

The following are best practices in preparing this presentation.

1. Be creative.

2. Incorporate graphics, clip art, or photographs to increase interest.

3. Make easy to read with short bullet points and large font.

4. Use speaker notes (found under the section View and “Notes” in the PowerPoint template you choose. These are for your personal use to use as a reference if you are giving your presentation to an audience and they help faculty identify what you will speak to your audience about.

5. Review directions thoroughly.

6. Cite all sources within the slides with (author, year) as well as on the Reference slide.

7. Proofread prior to final submission.

8. Spell check for spelling and grammar errors prior to final submission.

Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page.

Rubric

NR451_Milestone3_2 – Sept 18

CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe ProblemSummary of change model discussed. Practice Issue is stated. Scope of the problem includes information and/or statistics as it relates to your work area and scope of problem to healthcare as a whole discussed. Team and stakeholders and their role/reason chosen is discussed as is logical.30.0 ptsSummary of change model and Practice issue addressed. Information as it relates to work area, scope of problem to healthcare as a whole, is discussed. Team, stakeholders and role/reason chosen is discussed and is logical.26.0 ptsOne of the elements of the problem summary/practice issue listed in the first column is missing OR lacks detail.24.0 ptsTwo of the elements of the problem summary/practice issue listed in the first column are missing OR lack detail.11.0 ptsThree of the elements of the problem summary/practice issue listed in the first column are missing OR lack detail.0.0 ptsNone of the elements were present.30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe EvidenceDiscussion of the evidence is done in terms of themes of the multiple views given in the Systematic Review. Pertinent information is summarized. Sources are not listed individually but as an Evidence Summary synthesized into concepts discovered. Include the optional scholarly source if used.35.0 ptsDiscussion of the evidence is done in terms of themes the author/s pull from the multiple articles in the approved Systematic Review. Pertinent information is summarized. Sources are not listed individually but as an Evidence Summary synthesized into concepts discovered. (Include the optional supplemental scholarly article, if used.)31.0 ptsDiscussion of the evidence is adequately described and contains all elements in the first column.28.0 ptsDiscussion of the evidence is briefly described.13.0 ptsDiscussion of the evidence provides a minimal description OR is missing one or more elements from the first column.0.0 ptsThere is no discussion of the evidence.35.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe Action PlanPlan of action described. Important elements are discussed and logical. Timeline is thorough and contains all elements. Timeline is logical and appropriate.35.0 ptsPlan of action described. Important elements are discussed and logical. Timeline is thorough and contains all elements. Timeline is logical and appropriate.31.0 ptsPlan of action described but not all important elements included OR timeline is present but doesn’t contain all elements.28.0 ptsPlan of action and timeline are briefly described.13.0 ptsPlan of action and timeline are minimally described.0.0 ptsPlan of action is not present. The timeline is not present.35.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe Nurse’s RoleThe nurse’s role in the pilot plan is described and clear. Procedures for the pilot plan are clear and concise, from start to finish.25.0 ptsThe nurse’s role in the pilot plan is described and clear. Procedures for the pilot plan are clear and concise.22.0 ptsThe nurses’ role is described but not clear OR procedures are discussed but not clear.20.0 ptsThe nurses’ role and procedures are discussed but are not clear.10.0 ptsThe nurse’s roles and procedures are minimally discussed and lack detail.0.0 ptsNurses’ roles are absent. Procedures are absent.25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe ResourcesTracking process described and/or form for tracking the outcomes during pilot plan is included. Resources the nurses will need to help implement the plan are included. At least three resources are included. The nurse investigator, the team, internet resources, or other resources the staff needs is included.20.0 ptsProcess description and/or form for tracking outcomes during pilot study is included. Resources (to help with the project) the nurses need are included. At least three resources included. The nurse investigator, the team, internet resources, or other resources are included.18.0 ptsProcess description and/or form for tracking outcomes included. At least three resources the nurses need to help with the project are included but the resources were not the best suited resources for the project.16.0 ptsProcess description and/or form are missing 2 or more elements from the first column.8.0 ptsProcess description and/or form are missing multiple elements from the first column and lack detail.0.0 ptsProcess description and/or form for tracking outcomes is absent. No appropriate resources are listed.20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe SummarySummary slide reiterates the problem and purpose of the plan along with the measurable goals in terms of success.10.0 ptsSummary slide reiterates the problem; purpose of the plan; and, measurable goals.9.0 ptsSummary slide reiterates the problem AND purpose. Goals are stated but are not measurable.8.0 ptsSummary slide reiterates the problem OR the purpose, but not both. Goals are stated.4.0 ptsSummary slide reiterates the problem OR the purpose, but not both. Goals are not mentioned.0.0 ptsSummary slide is not shown.10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOverall PresentationPresentation is presented in a clear and logical manner. PowerPoint is appealing to the eye and includes creativity. Font is easy to read. Speaker notes are present.20.0 ptsPresentation is presented in a clear and logical manner. PowerPoint is appealing and includes creativity. Font is easy to read. All elements addressed.18.0 ptsPresentation is accurate and covers most elements.16.0 ptsPresentation content is accurate and can be followed, but lacks flow and creativity.8.0 ptsPresentation lacks organization and creativity. Is difficult to follow.0.0 ptsPresentation lacks any attempt at organization and comes across as chaotic.20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanicsIncludes title slide. Grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure are correct. References are properly cited in APA within the presentation. Reference slide includes all citations. Evidence of spell and grammar check.25.0 ptsExcellent mechanics. Includes title slide. Grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure are correct. References properly cited within the presentation. Reference slide includes all citations within the PowerPoint presentation. Evidence of spell and grammar check. Minimal errors in all.22.0 ptsGood mechanics and formatting considering the elements in the first column.20.0 ptsFair mechanics and formatting considering the elements in the first column.10.0 ptsPoor mechanics and formatting considering the elements in the first column.0.0 ptsVery poor mechanics and formatting such that the presentation was difficult to follow and comprehend.25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCorrect Use of Approved Systematic Review0.0 pts0 points lostCorrect use of Approved Systematic Review results in 0 points lost0.0 pts20 points (10% ) lostIncorrect or Unapproved Systematic Review results in 20.0 points (10%) lost0.0 pts

Paper Due? Why Suffer? That's Our Job!

Order New Solution